On Friday 03 October 2008 08:01, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > 2008/10/3 Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Hi Stefan > > > On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:25:16 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote: > >> I would like to apply for SRU team aswell, my daily work involves > >> working with the current stable release, so i think i can do o a good > >> job on it. I'm also interested in Q&A and security, which are some > >> things that will help me on this, so please consider this as my > >> application for the motu-sru team. > > > > speaking of it, I'm interested where you'd draw the border between what > > should go into -security and -updates. > > > > Also, I'd be interested about a personal nitpick: The ghc6 package as in > > intrepid right now, hasn't seen a new upstream version since hardy, but > > was updated with a number of fixes since then, a few irrelevant to hardy > > (e.g. adding a script that produces some output during the time-taking > > build, so that slow buildds won't fail due to timeout), but some which > > fix imho important bugs. How would you react if I'd request the current > > version in intrepid to go into hardy-updates? > > I would say you to make a debdiff of the fixes for important bugs, If > you want other things I would suggest you to ask for a backport.
How would you deal with it then if Stefan told you something along the lines of "I've been a MOTU for a very long time and I understand this stuff really well since I did most of the last GHC transition. I think it's better to put the whole version in -updates."? Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
