MOins, On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 13:33 -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 20:11 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Ah, that's interesting. I of course assumed that it would be clear > > that I'd > > give it a suitable version number. Why must a package in -updates have > > a > > different version number than a package e.g. in intrepid? > > Let's assume that our package has revision ubuntu4 in hardy, for > intrepid is there is no upstream version changes we will move that to > ubuntu5, right? then a new update comes to hardy-updates, if we just add > 1 to it it will be ubuntu5, as the one in intrepid, but those are > different, updates (usually), and then when we update to intrepid it > won't we superseded, since we already have the highest version number, > for that we add 0.something to them instead of 1!
I just lost the string... Do you mean: from ubuntu4 -> -updates -> ubuntu0.1 ? or from ubuntu4 -> -updates -> ubuntu4.1 ? Please clarify. BTW, what are you doing with -updates which needs to go to several releases, where the source has the same version+revision? Regards, \sh -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
