Who uses SMS much anyway these days ? Its all IM. We used to use small electronic boards from Bladox to encrypt SMS in the past but that was before IM and smart phones. There is very clear need for some kind of encryption proxy built into Ubuntu that could provide point to point encryption. I have always liked Phil Zimmermanns ZPHONE and how it worked. It sits in the protocol stack and when it detects another ZPHONE it jumps up and opportunistically encrypts using ZRTP. The key is generated in the media stream and wiped afterwards so no public key is needed, just verbal verification of the fingerprint strings.
Two ubuntu phones no matter which service they used would be able to send and receive encrypted messages or even audio point to point. OTR can easily be implemented as well. All that is needed is a way to announce to the world that you are capable of encryption and to do that all you need is to transmit a character at the beginning of each message and that can used to trigger OTR or ZRTP. The fingerprint strings could be brought up to the UI easily enough at the top like the battery or Wifi indicators and pulled down to view and verify. While we are on this topic, could someone get crypto.cat working on ubuntu as an app ? On 18 Jul, 2013, at 3:26 AM, Marius Kotsbak <[email protected]> wrote: > They have given up individual SMS charging in Norway too. Also the content > could be en compressed inside the encryption so that it might not require so > many SMS-es. > > Den 17. juli 2013 21:08 skrev "Gianguido Sorà" <[email protected]> > følgende: > Exactly, in the USA there are unlimited SMS but in other countries there > aren't. > In Italy for example if an operator give 200/month is a great deal. > I think that the XMPP approach is more useful, because (almost) free 3G/4G > data access is more reliable and easy to use. > > Il giorno 17/lug/2013 20:57, "Josh Leverette" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > I didn't say linking. Just breaking it up and sending them out. It's the > user's choice. Encrypting it won't make it take up more space necessarily. If > the user wants to send that many messages, they can. In a number of > countries, SMS is unlimited. Here in the United States, all of the companies > essentially gave up on charging for each message. It really is absolutely > free for the cell company, and once one of them started offering unlimited > SMS, none of the others could do any less and be competitive. Doing an XMPP > system would work too, but that requires having a data connection, which > should always be more expensive than SMS, realistically. I'm fine with it > being XMPP, but the advantage of using SMS is that it works even when you > barely have any signal, and SMS is dirt cheap compared to data, at least here > in the United States. I can't speak about the rest of the world, but SMS as a > technology is infinitely cheaper. Whether the company chooses to charge > appropriately, that's up to them. > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Rasmus Eneman <[email protected]> wrote: > Linking SMS cost money, you have to pay for every SMS. Also I'm pretty sure > you only can link up to 4 SMSes. > However an XMPP based service would still be better as key exchange may > happen automagically. You have > already broken the standard so why continue to use it when you only gets its > limitations? > > > 2013/7/17 Josh Leverette <[email protected]> > Also, I don't see why encrypting SMS would be impossible. You don't send > encrypted SMS to people who can't decrypt them. Since we're talking about > asymmetric encryption anyways, then the only people you could even think of > sending encrypted SMS to are people for whom you have a public key. If you > don't have a public key for a contact, then obviously you have no method of > encrypting a message to them. But, more importantly, you can always break up > an SMS into multiple SMS as the need arises, so length isn't an issue as long > as the user knows how many messages it will form. > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Mike Bybee <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, SMS obviously can't do GPG due to character limits - however, there are > dozens of varieties of secure SMS tools currently on Android. It seems that > some variety encryption could be supported by the default client - much like > OTR for Pidgin, etc. > Not that it should default to it - that would be awful. But that it should be > able to have an easy to enable option. > > There's a lot of people world wide mad about security right now - and if > Ubuntu Touch can eventually ship with a good basic set of security options, > it will appeal to people who otherwise might have no reason to use it. > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Rasmus Eneman <[email protected]> wrote: > You can't have GPG on SMS as it can't handle that amount of characters. Also > it would be stupid > as no one can't receive GPG/PGP SMS. If this feature is realy wanted on > Ubuntu to Ubuntu > then implementing something like iMessage or Hangouts should be done using > XMPP and bound > to the Ubuntu One account. > > > 2013/7/17 Mike Bybee <[email protected]> > Thanks. I think with PRISM and it's various world-wide equivalents, we're all > thinking about this. > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Josh Leverette <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still waiting on the actual native email client to be written. Once that > happens, adding encryption should be relatively trivial. So, whenever that > happens. > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Bybee <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there currently any plans to make sure the ubuntu mail app will support > gpg or some other standard - and likewise for SMS? > I know right now it just uses webmail, but I'm sure that's not the long term > goal > > -- > Thanks, > Mike Bybee > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > -- > Sincerely, > Josh > > > > -- > Thanks, > Mike Bybee > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > -- > Rasmus Eneman > > > > -- > Thanks, > Mike Bybee > > > > -- > Sincerely, > Josh > > > > -- > Rasmus Eneman > > > > -- > Sincerely, > Josh > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
