On 2/12/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote: > Did your comment mean to imply that for things that are not real bug > fixes but rather are just porting, we should mark as "blank"? I don't > think I like that idea. > Here's a couple of thoughts. My (slight, easy to talk me out of it) > preference is to just go ahead and mark everything in Jira that is > included in 2.1, as being included in 2.1. Yes, that will be a big > list. But we can say why it's so big. > <snip/> It would be difficult to cleanly distinguish between IBM-to-Apache migration issues and version 2.1 issues, and I don't think it's really worth the effort. Let's just mark everything we did for 2.1 as 2.1, that seems reasonable.
OK. -Adam
