Steve Lalonde wrote:
... Yep it is amazing the number of people who cant manage to send us only the attributes we tell them too. We have now taken to filtering out everything we don't want to see. There really is no point in sending me a Framed-IP-Address and a Framed-Route on a session that you want L2tp forwarded especially when you also forget to set Tunnel-Server-Endpoint etc.
Except, of course, BT required those to be sent with dummy values :-)
Neil it would be good if IPSC allowed us to specify the Tunnel-Server-Endpoint via radius, instead of the evil fixed set of IP addresses we currently have to specify on a CRF, so much more flexible. WBC already works like this. But it seams that BT have 2 separate teams looking after radius for IPSC and WBC, I had several meetings with the IPSC design guys before the product was launched (we were trialists) and they could not understand what we were asking for.
I agree - that would be useful.
