On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:57:28 +0100, James Bensley <[email protected]> said:

    > The media companies (seeing as they seem to be exclusivly US
    > based in my experiance) have no legal leg to stand on and no
    > proof. I'm not going to offend my customer or potentially damage
    > our relationship by presenting them with the legel warning when
    > the media company haven't provided any proof they are even in
    > the wrong.

We forward them for two reasons -- neither of which have anything to
do with caring about the media companies or whatever it is they
assert:

  - Many users are under the mistaken impression that bittorrent is
    somehow anonymous. It's not, and if they want to use it they
    should know that.

  - Looking at abuse reports, regardless of merit is work. If a user
    is doing something that is causing me work they should know about
    it so that hopefully they can try to not do things that create
    work for me.

Under no circumstances short of a (local) court order would I ever
give any information to the media companies.

-w

--
William Waites <[email protected]>  |  School of Informatics
   http://tardis.ed.ac.uk/~wwaites/       | University of Edinburgh
         https://hubs.net.uk/             |      HUBS AS60241

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Attachment: pgpXLAUvTJHN9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to