On 14 September 2015 at 11:49, Charl Tintinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Devil's advocate, lets face it, when they make a claim, its normally > correct.
I'd only partly agree > We all know that many people use Bit Torrent for generally illegal needs. I > doubt that they send out random 'your client has been naughty' without some > suitable evidence. erm, some cease and desists have been addressed to printers, devices normally incapable of running p2p software. just google for ACS Law for one egregious example of the industry's methods and their legal attack dogs.
