> Comparatively I can use our RIS system or use
> RIPREP images and rebuild a system in about an hour.

Imaging will always be faster than a native install.  If you are looking
for the fastest way to deploy an OS, it doesn't get any faster then
imaging.

I think you also have to weigh your time versus computer time.  To me
spending 3 hours installing a machine by hand is not acceptable, but
having a machine spend 3 hours to install itself is acceptable.  It
frees me to better spend my time.  The computer doesn't get paid by the
hour.

In my environment it takes about 2 hours to do an install (OS, no
patches, Office, Visual Studio 6 + MSDN, Visual Studio 2005 + MSDN, and
MatLab, and host of other small applications).

Brad Erdman
UMIACS


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
unattended-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info

Reply via email to