At 03:21 PM 7/7/2000 -0800, Kenneth Whistler wrote: >P.S. Donald Figge is right about the non-fixed nature of the 'fixed width' >em (or en). Em and en measurement is adjusted by the expansion factor >of expanded (or condensed) fonts. Er, yes, if you're mechanically expanding or condensing a font on the fly, as provided for in CSS and elsewhere, but doing this to a font will earn you time in typographical purgatory. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. If you are using an actual condensed or expanded font, the em and en will remain equal to the point size, and all the type designers living and dead will smile on you. Amen. John Hudson Tiro Typeworks Vancouver, BC www.tiro.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE John Cowan
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE John Hudson
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE John Hudson
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Markus Scherer
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Rick McGowan
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Michael Everson
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Markus Scherer
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE John Hudson
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Jonathan Coxhead
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Kenneth Whistler
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Asmus Freytag
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Edward Cherlin
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Gregg Reynolds

