At 02:25 PM 7/10/00 -0800, Jonathan Coxhead wrote: > In TeX, the difference is that an EM QUAD (\qquad) and an EN QUAD >(\quad) provide spaces that are legitimate breakpoints for lines within a >paragraph; while EM SPACE, EN SPACE (\enspace) and THIN SPACE (\thinspace) >produce horizontal space that cannot cause a line-break. > > My assumption on reading the Unicode standard was that this was the >intention---though it is not spelled out anywhere. Maybe a clarification >would be worthwhile. If so, the fact that TeX is so widely implemented and >used---at least within the arena of technical documents---might make it >worthwhile to preserve those characteristics. If that's indeed the case, we would be stuck now, since we can't change the canonical mappings.... A./
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE John Hudson
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Markus Scherer
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Rick McGowan
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Michael Everson
- Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Markus Scherer
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE John Hudson
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Jonathan Coxhead
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Kenneth Whistler
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Asmus Freytag
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Edward Cherlin
- RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE Gregg Reynolds

