Can someone please help me understand whether support for double byte is the same as being Unicode compliant. Any elaboration would be greatly appreciated. If for instance, being Unicode compliant has any additional value/benefits, etc... I'd like to understand how, why! Thanks, Jim Williams -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration table I apologize for sending the previous message three times. My e-mail client told me the first two attempts had been unsuccessful. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
- Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration table DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... John Cowan
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliterati... Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- RE: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... James Williams
- RE: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliterati... Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliterati... Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2

