At 12:02 AM 5/29/01 -0700, James Williams wrote: >Can someone please help me understand whether support for double byte is the >same as being Unicode compliant. Any elaboration would be greatly >appreciated. If for instance, being Unicode compliant has any additional >value/benefits, etc... I'd like to understand how, why! If you haven't done so already I would suggest you look for the link to the 'Technical Introduction' on the Unicode home page. You can find the link on the page http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/standard.html or on any of the "what is unicode?" pages. After that, you might want to read the online versions of chapters one and two of the Unicode Standard 3.0 (acessible via the page mentioned above). These should have ample material about the additional benefits. A./
- Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration table DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... John Cowan
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliterati... Keld Jørn Simonsen
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- RE: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... James Williams
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliterati... Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliterati... Keld Jørn Simonsen
- Re: Unicode-based Cyrillic-Latin transliteration t... DougEwell2