On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:17:02AM +0200, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Oops, I searched an example, and forgot to change the leading code.
This should have been read as: "ca-Latn-ESCI" or "ca-ESCI".
It's not importnat here, it was only an arbitrary example to show that the
syntax in RFC 3066 may become ambiguous to parse.
Someone says that this should be "ca-Latn-ES-CI" or "ca-ES-CI" without this
problem. But isn't there (sub-country) region codes with 4 letters?
Even if there were (my draft is at work and I can't check right now),
there's no problem. Script names are mixed case, and ISO 3166-2
subcountry codes are all upper.
--
Christopher Vance
