2012-11-17 0:20, Michael Everson wrote:

On 16 Nov 2012, at 22:12, Buck Golemon <[email protected]> wrote:

That's my personal understanding as well, but can you help me find 
documentation that I can show to my skeptical workmates?

"It is the basis for most popular 8-bit character sets, including Windows-1252 and 
the first block of characters in Unicode." 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_8859-1

That’s not really adequate. Wikipedia is neither authoritative nor accurate, and should not be cited in any dispute, except as opinions of unnamed people.

Being “basis” for something is rather vague, and in this case quite misleading, since Unicode and windows-1252 disagree on the assignments of several code positions.

It is the Unicode Standard that should be cited (as Doug Ewell did) in matters of Unicode code assignments.

Yucca




Reply via email to