The block is actually named for it. See: http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf
This FAQ talks about it: http://www.unicode.org/faq/blocks_ranges.html Finally, p217 of the standard actually says so explicitly: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.2.0/ch07.pdf Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect (Lab126) Chair (W3C I18N WG) Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. From: unicode-bou...@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Buck Golemon Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 2:12 PM To: Doug Ewell Cc: unicode Subject: Re: latin1 decoder implementation That's my personal understanding as well, but can you help me find documentation that I can show to my skeptical workmates? On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org<mailto:d...@ewellic.org>> wrote: Code points U+0000 through U+00FF in Unicode are identical to the corresponding code points 0x00 through 0xFF in ISO 8859-1. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell
