Actually, what Buck really needs is Section 16.1 Control Codes: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.2.0/ch16.pdf
That explains the situation for the *non* graphic characters in the range U+0000..U+00FF, which is the source of the concern for Buck's skeptical workmates, I'm sure. --Ken > You can quote the Unicode Standard, Version 6.2 itself: > http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.2.0/ch07.pdf > > On page 215 (Section 7.1, "Latin"): > "Unicode follows ISO/IEC 8859-1 in the layout of Latin letters up to > U+00FF."
