On 21 Jun 2013, at 11:26, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not instead encoding a new combining "MARSHALLESE CEDILLA" > that ought to be used with g, k, l, m, r and their uppercase counterparts? Because then there would be tree confusable ways of writing all this data. N WITH COMMA BELOW (looks like comma below), N WITH CEDILLA (looks like comma below, N WITH MARSHALLESE CEDILLA (looks like cedilla). Alongside O WITH COMMA BELOW (looks like comma below), O WITH CEDILLA (looks like cedilla below, O WITH MARSHALLESE CEDILLA (looks like cedilla). Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
