Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

[Asmus Freytag via Unicode]

On 2/21/2018 11:45 AM, David Starner via Unicode wrote: On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: “Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English word attested back to 1590. Curmudgeony may be identified as misspelled by Google, but it's got a bit of usage dating back a hundred years. Wiktionary's entry at [[-y]] says "This suffix is still very productive and can be added to almost any word.", and that matches my feeling that this is a perfectly good word, a perfectly wordy word, even if it wouldn't be used in formal English. Normally the ending -ly would mark an adverb. But not in this case. Which may be why some people feel consciously or not that the "l" is extra. A./