You have put words into my mouth. Please don’t. Your description of what I said 
is NOT accurate. 

> On 12 Jun 2018, at 03:53, Marcel Schneider via Unicode <> 
> wrote:
> And in this thread I wanted to demonstrate that by focusing on the wrong 
> priorities, i.e. legacy character names instead of the practicability of 
> on-going encoding and the accurateness of specified decompositions—so that in 
> some instances cedilla was used instead of comma below, Michael pointed out—, 
> ISO/IEC JTC1 SC2/WG2 failed to do its part and missed its mission—and thus 
> didn’t inspire a desire of extensive cooperation (and damaged the reputation 
> of the whole ISO/IEC).

Reply via email to