I was told that Dhalak offered to buy the back area a year before
Abbraccio bought the property and the city refused to sell it to them.
Unless Amare has access to this listserve . I think that a one-sided
discussion is irresponsible
Jim Cummings

On Apr 7, 2005 11:09 AM, Jonathan Cass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And don't forget about the potential liability that could arise if an
> employee/patron of Dahlak is injured while walking on Abbraccio's property
> on their way to the back entrance door.
> 
> It sounds like Abbraccio is being made the heavy because Dahlak is unwilling
> to take the necessary steps to legally use the outdoor terrace area.  Based
> on the way Dahlak maintains (or actually fails to maintain) their property
> on the Baltimore side, this does not come as a surprise.
> 
> Jonathan A. Cass
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Diller
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 10:36 AM
> To: Mark Krull
> Cc: Pfsni; Vincent/Roger; Victor Fiorillo; University City List
> Subject: Re: [UC] Abbraccio and Dahlak
> 
> If someone owns the land around it, then yes, it would be trespassing
> if they decided you couldn't use their land.
> 
> If I make a path thru my neighbors yard to my back door 'as an
> entrance' to carry stuff, I'd be trespassing while I walked across
> their yard, right?
> 
> It sounds like Dahlak has a back door but not access to the parking lot
> from that bad door.
> 
> -andy
> 
> On Apr 7, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Mark Krull wrote:
> 
> > Ummm...you got a point
> > -Mark
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Victor Fiorillo
> > Sent: Apr 7, 2005 10:15 AM
> > To: Vincent/Roger , University City List , Pfsni
> > Subject: Re: [UC] Abbraccio and Dahlak
> >
> >  Are you suggesting that it is improper or illegal for Dahlak to use
> > the back door as an entrance?  I can understand your complaint about
> > Dahlak using the area for seating, hanging out, but not the back
> > entrance issue.  What's the problem with that?
> >
> >
> > On 4/6/05 10:28 PM, "Vincent/Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sorry, I am a stupid idiot who hit the "send" button at the wrong
> > time; we'll try again.
> > We apologize for posting a commercial-related note on the listserves,
> > but rumors are flying (at least around here) and we'd like to try to
> > get some facts straight.
> >
> > With the advent of warm weather the rumors seem to flying again, so I
> > would like to take this opportunity to try and set a few facts
> > straight about Abbraccio and Dahlak.  
> >  
> > 1)      Dahlak's back outdoor terrace is not owned and has never been
> > owned by Dahlak.  Prior to our purchasing our property, this outdoor
> > terrace -- which is part of our parcel -- was owned by the city.
> > 2)      In 2003, L & I did a sweep of the neighborhood and all
> > businesses in the neighborhood as part of ongoing inspections that
> > they do of all neighborhoods on a regular basis.
> > We had no contact with L & I about Dahlak's outdoor operation.  At the
> > time, we were focused almost exclusively on getting our own building
> > built, and L&I (among others) was reducing us to tears almost daily.
> > 3)      L & I shut down Dahlak's outdoor operation because there were
> > no permits to operate; as well as the basement operation because of
> > safety concerns.
> > 4)      We have always said that Dahlak could rent or purchase the
> > outdoor space based on four principles:  1) proper zoning by the city,
> > 2) LCB approval 3) Insurance coverage and 4) Neighborhood approval
> >  5)      We met with Amare Solomon (Dahlak owner) and representatives
> > from Jannie Blackwell' office on many occasions to try and make this
> > all work.
> > 6)      We briefly rented the space to Dahlak as he worked to meet the
> > necessary requirements.
> > 7)      Only when the requirements were not met and the neighbors gave
> > us a petition asking us not to support the outdoor area we withdrew
> > our support.  Despite this, Dahlak does continue to use this area
> > daily as a rear entrance.
> > 8)      Cedar Park Neighbor's is now reviewing this issue- we do not
> > want to be put into a position between Dahlak and the neighbors.
> > 9)      We support a healthy commercial and restaurant environment and
> > support Dahlak, but if Dahlak wants to do something we are not
> > opposing it, but it is up to Dahlak to pursue and make it happen- we
> > have our own business to run and have in our opinion really bent over
> > backwards to make this work for Dahlak.
> >  
> > Any comments, suggestions?  Please feel free to let us know.
> >  215-727-8247 or by reply.
> > Roger Harman, Vincent Whittacre   from Abbraccio
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Need someone to watch your pet while you are away?
> > Call UC Pet Tenders:
> > Walking, feeding during lunch, vacations, or late evenings.
> > 215 990 6254
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Experienced!!!   References provided
> >
> >
> >  ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list
> > named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see .
> Andrew Diller
> HLN Consulting, LLC
> 215-888-9951
> 
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 


-- 
Jim Cummings

J. W. England Library/ILL

University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

600 South 43rd Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4495 USA

Telephone: 215-596-8969

Fax: 215-596-8760
democracy for Iraq should start with a referendum on the US occupation
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to