I completely understand - not everyone can be a connoisseur of such things. My patent offense is assuaged by your illiteracy of our affliction. If only my mommie had breast feed me I might not have such a proneness to force.
-- Sam Nicolary On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Jonathan Cass wrote: > Sam: > > Please accept my apologies for, apparently, unfairly linking you with Andy. > All you violent-prone thug-types look the same to me. > > Jonathan A. Cass > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Samuel Nicolary > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:55 AM > To: Herons > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character > > > Only "highly" offensive? I would have thought that this would be more on > the "patent" level of offense. And for what record? > > Sometimes I can barely draw meaning from what people write anymore because > I get so distracted by all the cliche sentence fragments with which people > chose to communicate. > > If there is a record - can we append this to it? > > If I am going to assault someone I would never use a weapon. Jonathan gets > me confused with lazy gun-toting mongrels like Andy Diller. I prefer a > more savage and primal form of violence if it comes to that sort of > encounter. I am _patently_ offended that Jonathan would imply otherwise. > > Harrumph, > > Sam Nicolary > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Herons wrote: > > > Re: "...perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action > while > > exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?" > > > > For the record: > > > > I find it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate - > or > > shoot - someone simply because he's a stranger, even a "suspicious" one. > To do > > so in a public forum makes it worse. > > > > If that isn't enough of a deterrent from making casual and callous > statements, > > keep this in mind: you never know how long that e-mail will live. Or how > many > > copies have been made of it, how many archives it may appear in years from > > now, or how far in the future it may come back to embarrass or harm. > > > > > > > Al > > Airone > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:01 PM > > Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character > > > > > > > This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy > set, > > > about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with > a > > > rotweiller dog, off the leash. This was the second time he was seen > > > lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly > > > casing houses). I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him. > > > > > > Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante > action > > > while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"? > > > > > > Jonathan A. Cass > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > > > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > > > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > > > ---- > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
