This is from a post of mine on July 29, 2007:

³Let¹s add to that the active recruiting of new members and/or diverting
existing members to the new listserv, because the UC listserv has a bunch
of, fill in the blank: crazies, cranks, belligerent non-viable entities with
whom you would NEVER want to communicate and the sort of people who are just
the fringe elements and not indicative of the wants of the ³real community.²
or:

³Come to our listserv.  You¹ll like it much better! You don¹t want to join
the UC listserv because....²


Well... I hate to say I told you so.



On 8/2/07 9:44 AM, "FX Winkler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Soon it will be very quiet because the only ones left will be the loonies.
> 
> Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>         
>>   
>> Subject: [UC] My Role with the List Serve
>>   
>> 
>>   
>>   
>>   
>> All (particularly Glenn Moyer):
>>   
>>  
>>   
>> Thanks for your reply Jon.
>>   
>> As with Andrew Zitcer¹s opinion piece in a citywide paper, you should have
>> disclosed your close relationship with Penn power brokers and leadership of
>> Campus Philly before I did it for you, and others did for Andrew on this
>> list. I know you but there are other individuals, who are in fact caught up
>> with some very distressing Penn initiatives.  I don¹t think badly of you nor
>> do I have any reason to believe your participation was anything but a
>> mistake.  I simply disclosed your connections and the timing in this very
>> serious matter. Please consider this a good-natured reprimand.
>>   
>> The issue is not about a lost kitty in the neighborhood so your disclosure
>> was  very important.
>>   
>> You are not a known regular on the list. You came onto a neighborhood
>> listserv with complaints about this open list, which serves as a serious
>> medium for communication in this neighborhood. Common individuals have
>> limited opportunities to freely communicate their ideas unlike Campus Philly
>> or Penn. 
>>   
>> In recent news accounts, this list sticks out as being so important that the
>> discussions are referenced. Some questionable characters with close ties to
>> the UCD assert that discussions about topics like lost kitties must be the
>> only topics here. Those posts are important too.  But I've noticed that any
>> discussion of serious issues that might be important to all community
>> residents are labeled as "noise" when the "wrong" viewpoints or questions are
>> asked.
>>   
>> At a time when a gang of list bullies is pretending that incivility here is
>> driving them to censorship, you joined in support of the effort without
>> offering disclosure. If you had been reading the list, you would have known
>> that Mr. Cassidy and the small chorus of advocates for censorship on a Penn
>> marketed site are indeed the core of a group of individuals who engage in
>> group listserv bullying.
>>   
>> They do the bullying against those who speak against some Penn policies and
>> the incivility of their mates engaging in the listserv bullying. I can show
>> you a powerful example when a couple of those whom would be banned stood up
>> against truly disturbing behavior.
>>   
>> A man was murdered in the neighborhood. With what seemed like perverse
>> pleasure, Cassidy and this "civil" gang were making extremely disturbing
>> callous jokes about the murder.
>>   
>> These individuals who would be banned and do post with civility stood up to
>> this perversity while those demanding civility were the abusive ones. In
>> fact, one of the individuals identified to be banned is a model of civility
>> while his character is attacked almost daily while the gang of the censored
>> list cheers on!
>>   
>> Had you been reading the list, you would know that the fallacious strategies
>> of Mr Cassidy, the Penn employee with complete power and secrecy over the new
>> list, and the gang have been thoroughly exposed and discredited. Because this
>> is a free and uncensored list, neighbors exercising their duty as citizens
>> exposed them just like they completely exposed Andrew Zitcer¹s ties to Penn!
>> It was a serious lack of disclosure, and I hope Andrew too made a mistake.
>>   
>> Your new post suggests you may understand why a Penn internet replacement of
>> a neighborhood listserv, demanding censorship and control, is a threat to
>> democratic principals in the twenty-first century??? The people you support
>> want Penn to replace an extremely valuable community communication medium
>> with one ruthlessly controlled and censored to support Penn policies.
>>   
>> Jon these people look like bullies and propagandists. Penn is involved and
>> unfortunately you have involved yourself and it appeared like Campus Philly.
>> You¹re not just any employee; you are the director of Campus Philly?
>>   
>> Please consider this request...
>>   
>> I¹d like to ask you for some help. I¹d like to take a complaint about
>> cloaking censorship directly to President Gutman¹s office. Penn is being used
>> to promote censorship. Penn resources are being used to support and MARKET
>> this new attempt at what seems like a larger pattern of neighborhood
>> censorship.  
>>   
>> That is specifically what bothered me about Andrew's opinion piece not
>> disclosing his connection in the issues.  He was making an attempt to
>> discredit those whose protest posters about Penn policies are mercilessly
>> torn down by UCD?
>>   
>> Really take a look at the censored site and the connections on a upenn.edu
>> mailing list where it is titled "Residents of University City." I went to
>> Penn too and worked at Penn or with Penn researchers for well over a decade.
>> I don¹t want to see this shame for the University.
>>   
>> A normal subscriber would have no chance to understand  the censorship and
>> banning that is protected information under Cassidy's control.  The only clue
>> is the warning that only Cassidy may know whom is subscribed.
>>   
>> Could you set up a meeting with Andrew Zitcer, you, and Ira Harkavy to
>> discuss this issue?
>>   
>>  I¹d like to have my complaint considered by the university first. This is a
>> very serious problem and it will bring shame and embarrassment to the
>> University.  I'd like the three of you to help make sure the complaint gets
>> to the President's attention.
>>   
>> Mr Cassidy immediately bragged about pre banning individuals. Even a cursory
>> glance at our list archives will show you that civility can not possibly be
>> the driving issue for this action.
>>   
>> What message does this send to other "residents of University City?" Penn is
>> already passively marketing this list as something it is not. When UCD and
>> other resources do this as well, I believe the picture will be  complete for
>> the media to investigate.
>>   
>> Thanks again for your reply,
>>   
>> Glenn
>>   
>> PS: Did you notice how civil the purple list is since the gang of bullies is
>> lying low? 
>>   
>>  
>>   
>>  
>>   
>>>   
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>   
>>> From: Jonathan Herrmann <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>   
>>> To: [email protected]
>>>   
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 6:04 PM
>>>   
>>> Subject: [UC] My Role with the List Serve
>>>   
>>> 
>>>   
>>>   
>>>   
>>> All (particularly Glenn Moyer):
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> There seems to be some confusion about my role with this list serve
>>> controversy. Here are my clarifications:
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> 1 - I live in University City/ West Philly. The nonprofit I direct, Campus
>>> Philly, has nothing to do with my participation on this or any other list
>>> serve in West Philly. In fact, our offices are now in Center City. We do
>>> have a relationship with Penn, Drexel, USIP, and twenty other schools, but
>>> we are an independent nonprofit and we are strictly concerned with our
>>> mission to attract, engage, and employ college students in the city and
>>> region.
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> 2 - I have never met Kyle Cassidy, and I once met Bruce Anderson. I am not
>>> in love with Kyle's new list and I am personally not in favor of any "new"
>>> list being on a Penn server. I do applaud Kyle for starting a new list
>>> because this list is very poorly organized, from my perspective, and I wish
>>> as a local resident for a more useful and less abused local list serve. My
>>> desire is for that list serve to be independent from Penn, despite the fact
>>> that I attended Penn, I contribute money to Penn, and on the whole I think
>>> Penn has done great work for the community. I think we are wasting resources
>>> by not using a universal service like Yahoo or Google that constantly adds
>>> new and useful community features. West Philly Freecycle is amazing, and
>>> simple, and not abused. But it is not a forum.
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> 3 - There has been an idea publicly floated by Bruce Anderson to merge the
>>> "new" list with the PFSNI list. I have no opinion about the PFSNI list,
>>> except that it is significantly less abusive than the UnivCity list, and
>>> therefore I read the PFSNI list. I presume that Penn runs the list as a
>>> service to the community, as PFSNI stands for Penn Faculty, Students,
>>> Neighborhood, Something... I therefore presume that if the "community"
>>> wanted to "take it over," then people on that list and at Penn should get
>>> together and talk about it.
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> 4 - The first time I ever spoke to anyone about this issue was my e-mail to
>>> UnivCity applauding the concept. I would not be writing about it publicly
>>> again if my company's name hadn't been alluded to in an e-mail.
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> 5 - I am personally (solely on my own behalf, not on behalf of my
>>> organization, my wife, or my wife's synagogue) planning to participate in an
>>> offline conversation about the need for a better list. I will publicly let
>>> you know that I wish there were a better list in this community, but I do
>>> not have any negative wishes against this list. I will simply unsubscribe
>>> when there is a better alternative. If I can be helpful to anyone working to
>>> create a better community list serve, I am not embarrassed to offer that
>>> help. I don't think it is called a conspiracy when it is done publicly.
>>>   
>>>  
>>>   
>>> Thank you,
>>>   
>>> Jon Grabelle Herrmann
>>>   
>>>  
>>> 
>>>   
>>> 
>>>   Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge
>>> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47093/*http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222> to
>>> see what's on, when.
>>>   
>>> 
>>>     
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.0/929 - Release Date: 7/31/2007
>>> 5:26 PM
> 
> 
>   
> 
> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47093/*http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222> to see
> what's on, when. 


Reply via email to