marflao wrote:
> Lol!
>
> Yep...saw that both version only differs a couple Euros..only the new
> power source raises it. Hmm..
>
>
>
> Honestly...haven´t thought yet of departing from the LMS on my NAS. So
> far I used it mainly for rescanning purposes and even if this takes some
> time it´s nothing that bothers me too much.
> Ok..once in a while when I play a song AND rescan the librarý in
> parallel it happens that the current played song stops or has dropouts.
> This is mostly with flacs higher that 24/96.
> Don´t know if those "negative aspects" won´t appear if the LMS is
> installed on the Pi.
>
> Cheers,
> M.
I have Lms installed on my Synology ds115 and another one on a rp2,
using Max2play (both pointing at my music library stored on my nas).
There isn't much difference in performance, in loading times or scanning
the library. But ... My Synology is also used for other stuff, mail,
website e.d, where as Max2play is a dedicated system. This is IMO the
main benefit of the Raspberry!
(I'll switch to picoreplayer when NFS is supported ;-)
-Synology nas DS115 - ('LmsUpdate'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?103636-Test-Repo-for-LMS-7-9-0-on-Synology-DSM-5-*&p=817970&viewfull=1#post817970))
-Raspberry PI2 (Max2Play), HifiBerry DAC+ (LMS/Squeezelite/Kodi)-
Cambridge Azur 840A - PMC GB1i
-2x Radio
-Laptop - openSUSE Tumbleweed - Squeezelite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pinkdot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34644
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105018
_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
