mudlark wrote: > For may people testing an improvement to audio equipment works one way > and one way only. Theory > testing >conclusion. It does not go Idea > > testing > conclusion. > > As an example, there is no rational theory that goes along the lines of > "low latency means better audio quality". If you can come up with a > rational reason why reduced latency improves audio then you have half a > chance of attracting any attention. Otherwise you will have to accept > the fact that an idea doesn't make a theory. > > The "just try it" way of doing things will never include rational > tweakers. > > I am happy to see the random stuff around, but where it affects the > mainstream I get very, very defensive. > > I see random stuff as go faster stripes. They may tweak your ego, but do > nothing for performance. > > Finally, I also defend the gold tap brigade. Life would be boring if we > all had the same attitude to life.
You guys are so funny. I put a link of the source so it's not a idea, theory out even a message from God. I have nothing to gain or loose from people trying out or not. You people would rather spend 20 minutes on a post vs the whole 10 seconds out would take to copy and paste it..... Fine by me... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106252 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
