JackOfAll wrote: > In general terms, IMHO, the Sabre design using on-chip ASRC with a > semi-decent single freq local OSC, will benefit less from Kali (or > re-clocking in general) than a PCM5xxx series design where the DAC PLL > is dependent on the MASH'd Pi BCLK. However, if you use the MCLK from > the Kali NDK 44/48M OSC's to drive the Sabre SYNC, and disable the OSC > on the Sabre HAT, you might have different results. I have opinions, > rather than validated scientific results, which is why I'm being > somewhat vague. Does that mean that the sabre design is treating the input as S/PDIF, neither mastering nor slaving to the pi's clock?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106193 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
