chill wrote: > Ah, ok, I misunderstood - different approach. That's to stop > Squeezeplay altogether, not just the player part.
Man in a van wrote: > > I have seen somewhere in the Joggler forum a command to stop Squeezeplay > from starting, so if there was/is room for a Jivelite instance it might > work that way. But it would only be a jivelite screen, not a choice > between the two. > Ah, I see what you mean now. A disk image loaded with Squeezeplay and Jivelite, so that one or the other could be started by modifying the startup sequence. Interesting. I wonder how much extra space the Jivelite binary would take on a system that's already got Squeezeplay - not much I expect, because most of the libraries will be there already. That's all getting a bit beyond what I was aiming for. I need to focus on finishing the Jivelite version - I think the only outstanding issue is the behaviour of the screensavers - then I'll see what my enthusiasm is like once that's finished. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110040 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
