I know that 9.2.2 runs much better than 9.1 under the Classic environment, 9.2 is also very stable and doesn't require any patching to work on an OW machine under X.Aside from screw those of us with older machines, is there any significant difference between 9.1 and 9.2 if it is your main OS?
-Robyn Lyons On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 07:48 PM, Charles Baker wrote: > OS 9.2.x has given me nothing but problems on my S900. After my system > crashing every 2 minutes, I switched my suitcase back to 9.1 and it is > much more stable. I did everything correctly, so I don't know what > went wrong. But my suggestion would to be to steer clear from 9.2.x. > There is no reason to run this unsupported as well as X, since the only > difference seems to be that Apple screwed OW ROM people. > > Just my 2 cents. -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
