On Saturday, June 29, 2002, at 05:54 PM, Robyn Lyons wrote:
> I know that 9.2.2 runs much better than 9.1 under the Classic
> environment, 9.2 is also very stable and doesn't require any patching to
> work on an OW machine under X.Aside from screw those of us with older
> machines, is there any significant difference between 9.1 and 9.2 if it
> is your main OS?
Apparently, and this is not based on fact, only hearsay and experience
of 9.2 users, OS 9.2.x was optimised to run on a G3 or higher machine by
pulling most of the support for older hardware and chipsets. This
explains why it runs fine on the last line of 604e machines but starts
to cough and lose it's feet on older machines, especially clones. I
don't know how rue that is.
--
Mark Benson
Vintage Macs List Nanny
aka
silicon_valley_pirate_uk (Yahoo! Messenger)
SilValleyPirate (AOL Instant Messenger)
Visit Flat Pack Macs Online at:
<http://fpm.gotdns.com>
Macintosh LC central
Microsoft Works - the world's largest oxymoron
--
Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html>
Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
