--- Clint Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/19/07, Gary Thornock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> --- Clint Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Just don't use Google for domains! >> >> I'm wondering whether you mean that Google for domains would >> be a bad fit for this list, or whether you're recommending not >> using Google for domains at all. > > Google for domains does host email (aliased) lists. And yes, > they'd be bad for our list.
The Google for Domains lists are really a different beast anyway. They're more suited to a "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" distribution list, not a public list where individuals manage their own subscription settings. Google Groups would be a workable solution for this list that most of us could live with. I tend to like mailman better, partly because of the ability to customize headers and partly just because it's what I'm used to using, but the differences aren't important enough to me that I'd object to either alternative. _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
