I'll check when I get home and on my mac but I'm pretty sure I have JDK 1.4 and 1.5 installed. I'll let you know what I find.
-Eric Timothy Carroll wrote: > i agree to moving forward. however, i think a documented work-around > to this issue should accompany the ga release. > > as for "What happened to the work-around of using two JDKs, one to run > the IDE and another to build/run uPortal?", i have yet to get this to > work in the mac environment. the mac likes to manage the available > jre implementations, so having two instances of the same version > co-habitating is somewhat tricky. > > erik (or anyone else), do you have any suggestions on how to install > and manage two instances of the same jre on a mac? > > thanks, tim > > > > Cris J Holdorph wrote: >> uPortal 2.5.x also had to create a uPortal specific patch of xalan >> 2.6, in order to fix a critical memory leak (if I remember >> correctly). While that got us by, it was never the desired approach >> to have a patched version of the xalan libraries. >> >> I believe even with the problems with netbeans, xalan 2.7 is a better >> library for uPortal 2.6.0 to use. >> >> ---- Cris J H >> >> Andrew Petro wrote: >>> Timothy, >>> >>> I hear your pain, and hope that by welcoming a couple Netbeans users >>> closer into the cadre of uPortal developers understanding and >>> support for using the IDE will improve. >>> >>> However, I think there are important ways in which the Xalan 2.7.0 >>> requirement is a feature rather than an impediment - uPortal is very >>> XML/XSLT heavy. Adopting the latest and greatest mainstream XML >>> libraries we can is a sound move. >>> >>> I'd suggest that this issue not impede 2.6.0 GA and become instead a >>> follow-on issue, likely one addressed by better doco on how to >>> develop uPortal using various IDEs. >>> >>> What happened to the work-around of using two JDKs, one to run the >>> IDE and another to build/run uPortal? >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>>> the only major impediment that i see is the xalan 2.7.0 requirement. >>>> >>>> it is a problem for those of us using netbeans for development >>>> >>>> there may be a work-around, but i have yet to find one that is >>>> desirable... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Andrew Petro wrote: >>>>> uPortal developers, >>>>> >>>>> I write to call the question of releasing uPortal 2.6.0 general >>>>> audience <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/2.6.0>, the >>>>> further incremental improvement on the available RC2 >>>>> <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/2.6.0+RC2>, as staged in >>>>> SVN as >>>>> >>>>> https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2/tags/rel-2-6-0-GA/ >>>>> >>>>> Releasing 2.6.0 GA creates a maintenance branch for >>>>> backwards-compatible patches towards 2.6.1, 2.6.2, etc. and frees >>>>> the HEAD for evolutionary work. >>>>> >>>>> With Eric's recent burst of activity to tie off niggling remaining >>>>> issues, I think we've gotten what we're going to get out of an RC >>>>> series on this and need to put this binary out there and start >>>>> work towards a 2.6.1 etc. >>>>> >>>>> +1 to release 2.6.0 GA. >>>>> >>>>> Andrew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev >>>> >>> >>> >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
