Jason,
* In the future, we should likely vote against a specific changeset or milestone being tagged as a GA, not on releasing the GA tag. Afterall, if we voted no what would we do? Retag GA but pointed at a different revision number? Seems to violate the contract of a tag if it changes over the lifetime of the repository.
Yes, if we'd voted no I'd have removed the tag and re-tagged with whatever changes were required to make the release acceptable. It's a harmless violation.
In theory I could have tagged and released an RC3 and proposed that the minimum diff on that be accepted as GA, but that sounds like extra work for benefits that exist only in principle.
Andrew -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
