I believe that is only a requirement if using JDK 1.4. The problem was the version of DOM needed to be changed so the JAR had to be put in the JDK's endorsed directory. I just double checked and I don't have any libraries in my JDK's endorsed directory.
Also I do believe that uPortal 2.6 requires JDK 1.5 -Eric Andy Gherna wrote: > IIRC, the requirement is to put the xalan-2.7.0.jar in to the endorsed > directory on the JDK specifically for use by uPortal. By putting that jar > into that directory (which affects the entire JDK that's being used), I > don't think this is necessarily just a Netbeans issue. > > Is there a way to install this jar so that there is less of an impact to the > entire JDK? For example, the endorsed/lib directory in Tomcat would be a > good place since its on the classpath for all its own internal workings and > web applications. And, this directory could easily be added to the > classpath for the command line tools in build.xml. This would > (theoretically) allow Netbeans to be used without changing the JDK. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:03 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] Xalan 2.70 and Netbeans >> >> Yes but this really seems more like a NetBeans issue than a uPortal >> issue. You would be running into the same problem with any project that >> needed to use Xalan 2.7 I'm assuming. Is there any chance of getting the >> NetBeans developers to provide a solution? >> >> I'm still at +1 for releasing and just adding some documentation to the >> release notes about known issues with this version of NetBeans on OS X. >> >> -Eric >> >> Andy Gherna wrote: >> >>> At the same time though, not being able to work w/ uPortal on your tool >>> >> of >> >>> choice is a limiting factor for some folks. >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Cris J Holdorph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 11:41 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] Xalan 2.70 and Netbeans >>>> >>>> Hmm... I have to disagree with this. I'd also feel the same way about >>>> Eclipse. We're trying to get 2.6.0 GA out the door. It's just my >>>> opinion, but I don't believe any issues that are specific to an IDE >>>> (Eclipse, Netbeans, Intellij, ...) should cause a delay in the release >>>> at this point in the release process. >>>> >>>> ---- Cris J H >>>> >>>> Timothy Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> i agree to moving forward. however, i think a documented work-around >>>>> >> to >> >>>>> this issue should accompany the ga release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja- >>>> sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
