Tim, Can you outline the exact issue again and what the possible work arounds are?
Thanks, -Eric Timothy Carroll wrote: > due to productivity issues, adopting this release will not be an > option for us until a work-around is in place, which is a shame > because there are so many improvements over 2.5.x (some of which we > contributed). > > however, i understand that netbeans does not hold a significant market > share among uportal developers, so from a practicality stand-point i > can justify moving forward since this is an issue with netbeans. this > would be similar to rolling out a ga release that does not operate > with jboss, because it does work with tomcat. > > if this issue applied to eclipse, rolling out would be completely > unacceptable due to the volume of users of that ide in correlation > with the uportal community. that would be similar to rolling out a ga > release that did not operate under tomcat. > > i'd like to see us take an approach that ensures support for the top > three tools of a category (i.e. ide-s, servlet containers, databases, > etc.) > > > > Cris J Holdorph wrote: >> Hmm... I have to disagree with this. I'd also feel the same way >> about Eclipse. We're trying to get 2.6.0 GA out the door. It's just >> my opinion, but I don't believe any issues that are specific to an >> IDE (Eclipse, Netbeans, Intellij, ...) should cause a delay in the >> release at this point in the release process. >> >> ---- Cris J H >> >> Timothy Carroll wrote: >>> i agree to moving forward. however, i think a documented >>> work-around to this issue should accompany the ga release. >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
