So currently there have only been two +1 votes. There has been some voiced support and descent but no actual votes. Any of the other committers out there have a chance to check out and give 2.6 a quick trial?
-Eric Andrew Petro wrote: > uPortal developers, > > I write to call the question of releasing uPortal 2.6.0 general > audience <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/2.6.0>, the further > incremental improvement on the available RC2 > <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/2.6.0+RC2>, as staged in SVN as > > https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2/tags/rel-2-6-0-GA/ > > Releasing 2.6.0 GA creates a maintenance branch for > backwards-compatible patches towards 2.6.1, 2.6.2, etc. and frees the > HEAD for evolutionary work. > > With Eric's recent burst of activity to tie off niggling remaining > issues, I think we've gotten what we're going to get out of an RC > series on this and need to put this binary out there and start work > towards a 2.6.1 etc. > > +1 to release 2.6.0 GA. > > Andrew > > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
