I'm not what you would call a power user, nor do I need an editor that handles multiple languages and syntax coloring variations. I like the truly integrated LC editor just fine. It is great to see users providing options for those who need more than that.
~Roger On Feb 21, 2017 9:28 PM, "Richard Gaskin via use-livecode" < email@example.com> wrote: > It's always exciting to see new ground explored with inter-app > communications, but with script editors I find myself wondering: > > Why not use LC's? > > If it's not on par with alternatives and for some reason can't be made to > be on par, why don't we just ship LC with an appropriately-licensed editor, > allow hooks like the ones discussed here for any other editor folks might > want, and spend the development time we used to spend on LC's editor on > other things? > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World Systems > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list email@example.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode