I was hoping for a command that left the screen lock set but forced an update of the screen. That way I wouldn't have to unlock/relock and depend on there only being one screen lock pending.
Bob S > On Aug 21, 2017, at 08:51 , J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I was unaware of that too. It doesn't sound right. > > > > On August 21, 2017 10:10:27 AM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > >> Yup. My troubles came when I had a handler unlock the screen 5 times >> straight and I do not lock the screen to that many levels. It still did no >> unlock the screen, so now it may be that one handler cannot unlock another >> handler's lock screen, which I was unaware of. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
