Viktoras,
The availability of OOP really doesn't affect the scope of
applications. Nor does it affect the use of C++. You won't be able to
use C++ anyway, you need to create externals for that, which you can
do already. Last but not least, I can't think of any code more
readable than Talk code.
.
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
--
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
A large collection of scripts for HyperCard, Revolution, SuperCard and
other programming languages can be found at http://runrev.info
On 19 mrt 2008, at 15:19, viktoras didziulis wrote:
Hi,
me too like rOOP, but I feel it is a little incomplete, just one
more step. The ones that you call real objects are limited to user
interface controls only. The thing I was curious about is a
possibility to create an independent data object which is nor
control neither a gui element. Which in this case may simply mean
enhanced arrays...
What for ?. I think this would make code cleaner and reduce amount
of commenting in larger projects.. Also facilitate creation or
adoptions of existing libraries in C or C++ for very specific
purposes - like reading shapefiles, netcdfs, doing geographical
transformations, astronomy, bioinformatics, etc... This consequently
will increase the scope of applications that can be created in Rev
and hopefully availability of diverse libraries.
In general it would make creation of complex software easier. We can
already simulate objects using arrays, but at least the code would
be more readable (!!!) if I were able to distinguish array
operations from object manipulations.
Best wishes
Viktoras
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
