Re: pre-beta

[Oliver Hardt]

hi: i am sorry to say this, but i am feeling as if i was taken for a ride here. wasn't the story in november that the reason for not releasing 2.0 as scheduled was thorough testing and what not? and now i am reading on the list that the pre(!!)-beta cannot open some stacks properly, and some stuff (apparently a lot) is not even yet implemented! that doesn't sound like a product in testing phase (thus *pre* beta).
i would really encourage you guys up there in scottland to tell us what the real problem is. i cannot believe this "testing" argument any more. honestly, i don't care whether it takes another year to release the final version (because the current version is working for me) -- just put the cards on the table.
best, olli.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution