On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 08:04 AM, Oliver Hardt wrote:
It should have been called Alpha 17 instead of Pre-Beta.
i would really encourage you guys up there in scottland to tell us what the real problem is. i cannot believe this "testing" argument any more. honestly, i don't care whether it takes another year to release the final version (because the current version is working for me) -- just put the cards on the table.
But think about it from their perspective at RunRev. Damned if they do, Damned if they don't. People will be complaining either way until 2.0 is actually released. Not an easy situation to be in.
Personally I was just frustrated because I really wanted to do some serious testing and start learning some of the new 2.0 features, but am not able to because the IDE is still too buggy to work with. However I've only been programming RunRev for a couple of months; so I'm not the best judge of how far along it is really.
Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
