Are we all setting up the company for failure or something? First we have our favorite resident troll who keeps repeating the v-charge, the company gives us the pre-beta (to which we're really not entitled not having paid for one of the pro-licenses) to show the v-charge to be false, and then we all whine about how buggy/incomplete the pre-beta is.
I haven't taken a look at the latest version but I was pretty happy with the alpha I saw last November or whenever it was. What, does v.1 not work? Think that Maromedia does any better? (HOW long did Mac users have to wait for an OSX/MX version?!). And, no, I have not been temporarily possessed... No need to call out the exorcists. :( Judy On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Bernard Devlin wrote: > I have been starting to have the same suspicion myself. It does seem a bit > strange to have announced 2.0 (along with screenshots) in November. > > I know that I bought my license for 1.1.1 on the basis that the release of 2.0 > was imminent. And a friend who I introduced to Rev has written an application > that really needs some features in 2.0, and she bought the her 1.1.1 license on > the basis that 2.0 was imminent. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
