Judy Perry wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> Given the limitations of the old Mac sound architecture,
>> and the flexibility of player objects, what's the upside
>> to HC's method?
>
> No Players?
>
> ;-)
>
> No latencies?
True, the QT architecture is not known for its nimbleness. ;)
But aside from emulating sequencers (rarely done these days with
GarageBand and all the cool MIDI tools and real sequencers available),
how often does the modest latency introduced by QT affect things noticeably?
I'm just grateful I never need to spend another wetware clock cycle
dealing with the differences between SND Type 1 and Type 2 resources. :)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
