I don't normally get into this kind of stupid arguments but I must be tired or something.

Is the Dr. in front of you name stand for Doctor??? If so I can't believe you are complaining that $75. is not reasonable for Rev. I bet you don't feel that way about the work you do, I bet you charge top dollar. And that for things people can't live without - you have them over a barrel. If you say you don't I won't believe it because you choose to display the Dr. before your name which is all I needed to see.

And like the lady said, you could easily just build a player and be done with it. So why the complaining? Why the disappointment? Why the cheapness?

Jac, There are doers and talkers out there, I can tell you are a doer. :-) Good for you.

PS I spent my money on the enterprise version and absolutely am not disappointed! (I would like my manuals though) :-)

Oh well, I opened my mouth now.

Tom - The Amateur

On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 11:46 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

On 11/2/03 10:25 PM, Dr.John R.Vokey wrote:

(however ``reasonable''---give me a break--US$75 for the minimum?)--

*If* a free---no network checked, 30-day ``demo''---of MC (i.e., an ``engine to run the stacks) were still (and always) freely available, I would be less concerned, but don't you (or Gay, or ...) defend the current model as ``reasonable'' as if that were the issue.

`I am just a bit disappointed.'' Forget that: I am totally disappointed.

Um. There is nothing preventing anyone from creating a one-card standalone and making it available for free as a player.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to