Re: Losing the amateur.

[David Kwinter]

I agree completely with Ryon. I think Revolution 1.1.1 and the 2.x are 
completely different products. The upgrade was far from seamless in 
both functionality and hobbyist-appeal. Does anyone else have large 
projects which run fine in 1.1.1 but not any 2.x? Like the concorde, 
for the meantime the future is behind us.

On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 09:59  PM, Alex Rice wrote:

On Nov 2, 2003, at 9:46 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Um. There is nothing preventing anyone from creating a one-card 
standalone and making it available for free as a player.
In fact I think Scott Rossi has done that for his various games and 
demos on his site. Don't know if it's general purpose though.

But I definitely missed the point of Ryno and John. I do understand 
that the licensing changes have been major. I shouldn't presume 
anything- because I was not on the scene for Hypercard nor even 
Metacard. Sorry guys.

It would be interesting if Scott Raney would followup on this thread. 
(hint, hint) :-)

Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software | 
<http://mindlube.com>

what a waste of thumbs that are opposable
to make machines that are disposable  -Ani DiFranco
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution