Maybe I should have said 'another lengthy function call per line'...
I already use a cached file list, but if I hit a folder with thousands
of files in it and only need the size of 1 file in that particular
folder, it seems like wasted CPU time to pull the entire folder contents.
Richard Gaskin wrote:
John Craig wrote:
I'm recursing through a (sometimes large) list of files and folders
which can take a while, so I was trying to avoid another function
call per line.
A perfect case for using "the detailed files", so you can rapidly get
all of the size info for an entire directory in one call, and the just
format the info or calculate it however you need.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
