Arjo Rozendaal wrote:
Why shouldn't WinXp support more than two cpus?
on the packaging of XP pro it has a sticker saying : "2cpu edition"
Maybe XP does not realise that these multiple cores do not constitute an
additional cpu ;P (ie dual quad cores would be feasible)
I'm using a dual opteron dual core system without problems.
So 4 threads running in RS.
ahh.. sweet ! So does XP show you 4 cpus in task manager then ?
I'm only waiting for Vista and RS to support 64bit.
aha.. I've not read anything about vista as it sounds pretty awful from
my initial findings.. So its then a 64 bit version of windows natively ?
B)
