I hope that this company will keep their promise in the future which
is: "*full-featured 3d software...*". that's what i am looking for and
what i will always be looking for. The key word is "full-featured"...
Best regards,
Juha M.
You are harsh here Juha, it is 'full-featured' in the sense that it's a
general tool packed with features, not a specialized tool.
Your expectations are just too high, you can't expect a general tool to
be as good in all specialized areas as the specialized tools that devote
all their development time to this one area. For example: procedural
skies and landscapes will never be rendered as convincingly in RS as in
Terragen2 or Vue, because a landscape renderer is specialized in this
area and has its own unique algorithms, and it took the teams years to
develop and refine them.
There are areas where RS excels, like architecture, industrial design,
SDS (I saw some requests, needs updating?), the overall philosophy of
openness, total flexibility and 'power under the hood', and many more...
There are also areas where RS is infuriating ;)
And by the way, RS GI is /real/ GI - but slow...
my 2 cts,
Mark H
