WEIRD that it was working before… with one node.  Granted that this is a
rare config (one cassandra node) but it shouldn't work then.

If you attempt to write ONE to a single cassandra node, there is no (in
addition to) additional node to write to…

So this should have failed.

Bug?

… and I know why this is failing… my cassandra node is "joining" the
cluster now, but none of the ports are open.  So all writes will fail… I
have NO idea why the ports aren't open yet .. but it's not a firewall issue.



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Andrew <redmu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ONE means write to one replica (in addition to the original).  If you want
> to write to any of them, use ANY.  Is that the right understanding?
>
> http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.0/dml/data_consistency
>
> Andrew
>
> On July 22, 2014 at 7:43:43 PM, Kevin Burton (bur...@spinn3r.com) wrote:
>
>  I'm super confused by this.. and disturbed that this was my failure
> scenario :-(
>
> I had one cassandra node for the alpha of my app… and now we're moving
> into beta… which means three replicas.
>
> So I added the second node… but my app immediately broke with:
>
> ""Cassandra timeout during write query at consistency ONE (2 replica were
> required but only 1 acknowledged the write)""
>
> … but that makes no sense… if I'm at ONE and I have one acknowledged
> write, why does it matter that the second one hasn't ack'd yet…
>
> ?
>
> --
>
>  Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> Location: *San Francisco, CA*
> blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
> … or check out my Google+ profile
> <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
>  <http://spinn3r.com>
>
>


-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Reply via email to