The only real use case for not using pax-logging I've heard about is because people wanted to use logback as a backend. I think this might be solved by having a pax-logging implementation based on logback instead.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 04:01, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for interest; any reports by now on this topic? This might be > interesting for other users too and I think a page in the usermanual ("How > to use Karaf without pax-logging") might be a good idea. > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 23:01, codeoncoffee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Excellent. I'll give it a try and report back with steps taken >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3177529.html >> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
