On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm actually not aware of the licensing terms of Neoclipse itself?! > IMHO, Neoclipse should be licensed as particiation-friendly as > possible, which for me is Apache license version 2. What do the others > say?
+1 on ASLv2. -- Emil Eifrém, CEO [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com Cell: +46 733 462 271 | US: 206 403 8808 _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
