Hi! Thanks for the input, I'll look into doing it in the returnable evaluator.
Good points :-) /anders Johan Svensson skrev: > Hi, > > You could implement your own returnable evaluator only to return "best > match" or "complete match" nodes. If not I would pick the nested loop > one since code is cleaner or write a combination of traverser + for > loop in one of the evaluators. > > -Johan > _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
